In November 2016, the Slovak Parliament passed an amendment to the Act on Insolvency and Restructuring (“IARA”). One of its major aims is to address defects in the law of personal insolvencies, which are a huge social and economic problem in Slovakia. Since the IARA first took effect in 2005, the number of persons who have filed for personal insolvency is lower than in other EU countries even though, at first glance, the conditions seem favorable. The amendment came into force on 1 March 2017.
Personal bankruptcy under the IARA was problematic for several reasons:
– Debt relief was then granted only after an additional 3-year period.
– The law disadvantaged those in dire financial circumstances by requiring advance payment of EUR 663.88 for costs and trustee and the demonstration of assets worth at least EUR 1659.70;
– The court determined the amount the debtor had to pay to creditors during the 3-year period before approval of debt relief, which could be up to 70% of the debtor’s net income. However, the law did not require the debtor to notify the liquidator of any increase in income during the 3-year period. That meant that the system could be abused if, at the beginning of the proceeding, the debtor could demonstrate a lower income than he really had. The advance payment could not be waived and, together with the need to demonstrate sufficient assets, it proved an insurmountable obstacle for many ordinary people.
Particulars of the new amendment
The amendment does away with the IARA’s two-phase process, and introduces two new options for those seeking personal bankruptcy, modeled on foreign legal systems’ approaches:
a) liquidation of the debtor’s assets and quick debt relief, referred to as insolvency proceedings (Fresh Start); or
b) restructuring of the debtor’s obligations with a payment schedule (No Fresh Start).In both cases, the debtor is automatically relieved of debt – as of the day the bankruptcy petition is filed in insolvency, or as of the day the payment schedule is approved and claims become unenforceable towards the debtor in the case of a repayment schedule. Debt relief through either method can only be requested once every 10 years.
The amendment includes provisions for the mandatory legal representation of the debtor during either type of bankruptcy proceedings. The debtor may be represented by the Centre for Legal Aid (“Centre”) or by an attorney designated by the Centre, or, in the case of a payment schedule, the Centre can assign an attorney chosen by the debtor. The bankruptcy petition or application for a payment schedule can only be filed if an enforcement proceeding or similar proceeding is pending against the debtor.
– claims satisfied in insolvency or under a payment schedule, such as ordinary claims established before the insolvency, future claims of warrantors and co-debtors, etc.;
– claims excluded from satisfaction, such as claims from bills of exchange, contractual fines, accessories to claims exceeding a certain amount, monetary claims of affiliated parties, etc.; and
– claims not subject to debt relief, such as legal aid granted to the debtor by the Centre, alimony, etc.
As of the day a petition for bankruptcy is filed, the right to dispose of debtor’s assets is transferred to the trustee. However, the debtor may continue to use the assets in the usual way.The amendment introduces the so-called unenforceable value of the home. The unenforceable value of the home is part of the value of the residence which the debtor specifies as their living quarters (EUR 10,000). If the market value of the home exceeds the unenforceable value, the home will be sold and the unenforceable value paid to the debtor, with the money deposited in a special bank account which can be used to pay creditors only with the debtor’s consent.
The period of satisfaction for unsecured creditors is 5 years, with satisfaction not lower than 30%, and at least 10% higher than the satisfaction that would be achieved in insolvency. The trustee publishes the proposed payment schedule in the Commercial Bulletin, including the dates and amounts of proposed payments. Creditors and the debtor may file objections to the proposal within 90 days of publication. The proposal, together with the objections and the comments of the trustee and debtor on the objections, are examined by the court, which determines the final payment schedule. If the court finds that the debtor’s circumstances do not support the proposed payment schedule, the proceeding is suspended and the court instructs the debtor about the possibility of filing for insolvency.